You seem to be tossing about a number of theories. However, a lack of precision and clarity makes these theories unverifiable.
Responding to challenges to your theories with “Being deep is not where I want to go with this. I probably don’t have the capacity “ does little to advance your arguments. This is especially worrisome since you are in a privileged position to influence thousands of educators.
in this thread people have challenged your depth of understanding and you have responded by just repeating yourself
to increase my understanding of developments of literacy then I would study someone who has actually looked deeply into literacy, eg James Gee http://www.readingonline.org/articles/handbook/gee/index.html
This scrutiny is long overdue.