For some reason Ken DeRosa thinks that quoting an out of print, 13 year old history text written by an infamous Bush crony demonstrates something. Funny how staunch advocates of "scientifically based research" just start making bald assertions, completely unencumbered by even anecdotal evidence or first-hand experience, when it is convenient to them. Is there any reason this text leads to the kind of analysis DeRosa apparently expects of ninth graders? Dead reckoning, indeed.
I'm disappointed, Tom, you failed to work in the Iraq war and Halliburton.
Post a Comment